Lonely Lion

Just a quick response to this write up on the lack of growth in Python 3000. Python 3000 really isn’t the giant sea change that I thought it was going to be. Most of the significant work is under the covers, optimizations that will benefit me without me necessarily knowing it. The author of the above post (I’m sorry, I couldn’t find the author’s name), like me, is a fan of Ruby and Python. I think he wants Python 3000 to take on some of the traits we both love about Ruby (extreme flexibility, cleverness, many ways to do it). I know where he’s coming from, but that wouldn’t be very ‘Pythonic,’ it would be ‘Rubyonic.’

One of my favorite bits about being a polyglot is the differences between languages. What’s the point of making Python like Ruby? What’s the point of making Perl like Python? If everyone is sort of doing the same thing, where’s the fun in learning new stuff? I love Python, I love Ruby, I even love Perl. Let’s preserve their differences. Python doesn’t want you to muck around with the syntax, Ruby does. Use Ruby when appropriate, use Python when appropriate. Right?

Speaking of polyglotism, I bought that Prag-Prog Errrrrlang book over the weekend. All variables are constant, and must start with a capital letter. How’s that for balls nuts? Woo hoo! Viva la Different!