<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Twitter on Rails</title>
	<link>http://weblog.lonelylion.com/2007/04/12/twitter-on-rails/</link>
	<description>Chris McAvoy's Blog</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 03:14:17 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://weblog.lonelylion.com/2007/04/12/twitter-on-rails/#comment-15150</link>
		<author>Steve</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 17:08:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://weblog.lonelylion.com/2007/04/12/twitter-on-rails/#comment-15150</guid>
					<description>I don't know either, but yeah, I can only imagine they've taken advantage of clustering and whatever enterprise services Mysql has to get a handle on that beast.

I do think it was interesting they mentioned Python. I wonder if Java would be slower or faster. In theory faster, but maybe not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know either, but yeah, I can only imagine they&#8217;ve taken advantage of clustering and whatever enterprise services Mysql has to get a handle on that beast.</p>
<p>I do think it was interesting they mentioned Python. I wonder if Java would be slower or faster. In theory faster, but maybe not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Timothy Dinkins</title>
		<link>http://weblog.lonelylion.com/2007/04/12/twitter-on-rails/#comment-15152</link>
		<author>Timothy Dinkins</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 20:31:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://weblog.lonelylion.com/2007/04/12/twitter-on-rails/#comment-15152</guid>
					<description>I work on a Rails application that uses MySQLs NDB clustering.  We do use multiple read and write servers and achieve that with a load balancer in front of the NDB cluster.

NDB cluster can definitely give you faster read performance, but if you have a lot of writes (which we don't, compared to reads) you will suffer.  Also table joins are more expensive with NDB.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I work on a Rails application that uses MySQLs NDB clustering.  We do use multiple read and write servers and achieve that with a load balancer in front of the NDB cluster.</p>
<p>NDB cluster can definitely give you faster read performance, but if you have a lot of writes (which we don&#8217;t, compared to reads) you will suffer.  Also table joins are more expensive with NDB.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tupleman</title>
		<link>http://weblog.lonelylion.com/2007/04/12/twitter-on-rails/#comment-15155</link>
		<author>Tupleman</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2007 05:28:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://weblog.lonelylion.com/2007/04/12/twitter-on-rails/#comment-15155</guid>
					<description>See also: The Vietnam of Computer Science 
http://blogs.tedneward.com/2006/06/26/The+Vietnam+Of+Computer+Science.aspx</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>See also: The Vietnam of Computer Science<br />
<a href="http://blogs.tedneward.com/2006/06/26/The+Vietnam+Of+Computer+Science.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.tedneward.com/2006/06/26/The+Vietnam+Of+Computer+Science.aspx</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
