Comments on: Pyglet Great, Math Hard http://weblog.lonelylion.com/2007/11/14/pyglet-great-math-hard/ Chris McAvoy's Blog Thu, 20 Nov 2008 15:33:13 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3 By: bulkanix http://weblog.lonelylion.com/2007/11/14/pyglet-great-math-hard/#comment-16340 bulkanix Fri, 16 Nov 2007 11:43:19 +0000 http://weblog.lonelylion.com/2007/11/14/pyglet-great-math-hard/#comment-16340 The title is misleading, i had the impression before reading the post that Pyglet was bad at handling 'math' where as it's you that sucks at math (which i do too!). The title is misleading, i had the impression before reading the post that Pyglet was bad at handling ‘math’ where as it’s you that sucks at math (which i do too!).

]]> By: Thomas http://weblog.lonelylion.com/2007/11/14/pyglet-great-math-hard/#comment-16332 Thomas Wed, 14 Nov 2007 21:29:37 +0000 http://weblog.lonelylion.com/2007/11/14/pyglet-great-math-hard/#comment-16332 So, of course the first question that pops into *my* head when I hear about this PyEuclid, is, "does the existence of a python euclidean geometry module suggest the existence of a python non-euclidean geometry module?" The answer, I am happy to report, appears to be yes, at least one: http://pygeo.sourceforge.net/ Awesome! So, of course the first question that pops into *my* head when I hear about this PyEuclid, is, “does the existence of a python euclidean geometry module suggest the existence of a python non-euclidean geometry module?” The answer, I am happy to report, appears to be yes, at least one: http://pygeo.sourceforge.net/

Awesome!

]]>