http://weblog.lonelylion.com/2008/03/19/yes-simon-we-need-a-queue/ Chris McAvoy's Blog Thu, 20 Nov 2008 18:48:50 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3 http://weblog.lonelylion.com/2008/03/19/yes-simon-we-need-a-queue/#comment-16845 johnnnnnnn Wed, 02 Apr 2008 19:35:32 +0000 http://weblog.lonelylion.com/2008/03/19/yes-simon-we-need-a-queue/#comment-16845 Have you seen memcacheq: http://memcachedb.org/memcacheq/ ? Have you seen memcacheq: http://memcachedb.org/memcacheq/ ?

]]> http://weblog.lonelylion.com/2008/03/19/yes-simon-we-need-a-queue/#comment-16814 Ian Bicking Sun, 23 Mar 2008 21:18:13 +0000 http://weblog.lonelylion.com/2008/03/19/yes-simon-we-need-a-queue/#comment-16814 We wrote a queue for work: http://www.openplans.org/projects/cabochon/ -- I know the author looked at ActiveMQ, but I don't recognize some of the other systems linked to there. We just wanted a simple HTTP-based event queue. All the queue systems I've seen seem... well, focused on performance, transactions, etc. I just want to pass around some messages with a simple publish/subscribe model. As casual users the current batch of systems I see all seem quite complex. But maybe there is a less complex subset that would be workable. We wrote a queue for work: http://www.openplans.org/projects/cabochon/ — I know the author looked at ActiveMQ, but I don’t recognize some of the other systems linked to there. We just wanted a simple HTTP-based event queue. All the queue systems I’ve seen seem… well, focused on performance, transactions, etc. I just want to pass around some messages with a simple publish/subscribe model. As casual users the current batch of systems I see all seem quite complex. But maybe there is a less complex subset that would be workable.

]]>