<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Objective-C, Cocoa, OSX Desktop Apps &amp; iPhone</title>
	<atom:link href="http://weblog.lonelylion.com/2009/01/28/objective-c-cocoa-osx-desktop-apps-iphone/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://weblog.lonelylion.com/2009/01/28/objective-c-cocoa-osx-desktop-apps-iphone/</link>
	<description>Chris McAvoy likes kites</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 00:29:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colin</title>
		<link>http://weblog.lonelylion.com/2009/01/28/objective-c-cocoa-osx-desktop-apps-iphone/comment-page-1/#comment-297</link>
		<dc:creator>Colin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 23:10:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblog.lonelylion.com/?p=803#comment-297</guid>
		<description>check out: http://antoniocangiano.com/2009/03/29/why-macruby-matters/

Basically: Ruby + Cocoa will not rely on bridges in the future...   LLVM&#039;s Compile-time optimization will almost certainly translate to iPhone development once mature, even if JIT is not made available for system performance reasons (which is dubious given it&#039;s great performance levels and increasing iPhone hardware).

Re: cross-platform (beyond OSX/OSXmobile), this is definitely important for MANY tiers of developers.
I honestly think things are looking good from Apple&#039;s end of things, assuming they follow thru on MacRuby (extending the approach to a MacPython would be even better).
...So I don&#039;t know if the problem is really on the MacRuby side of things, or if it&#039;s equally/more a question of  &quot;language independent .NET development&quot; working as promised...?

I&#039;m not sure if you&#039;re already aware, but if you need more motivations to be happy about working in XCode, you may want to check out:
http://www.brandonwalkin.com/bwtoolkit/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>check out: <a href="http://antoniocangiano.com/2009/03/29/why-macruby-matters/" rel="nofollow">http://antoniocangiano.com/2009/03/29/why-macruby-matters/</a></p>
<p>Basically: Ruby + Cocoa will not rely on bridges in the future&#8230;   LLVM&#8217;s Compile-time optimization will almost certainly translate to iPhone development once mature, even if JIT is not made available for system performance reasons (which is dubious given it&#8217;s great performance levels and increasing iPhone hardware).</p>
<p>Re: cross-platform (beyond OSX/OSXmobile), this is definitely important for MANY tiers of developers.<br />
I honestly think things are looking good from Apple&#8217;s end of things, assuming they follow thru on MacRuby (extending the approach to a MacPython would be even better).<br />
&#8230;So I don&#8217;t know if the problem is really on the MacRuby side of things, or if it&#8217;s equally/more a question of  &#8220;language independent .NET development&#8221; working as promised&#8230;?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure if you&#8217;re already aware, but if you need more motivations to be happy about working in XCode, you may want to check out:<br />
<a href="http://www.brandonwalkin.com/bwtoolkit/" rel="nofollow">http://www.brandonwalkin.com/bwtoolkit/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
